BREAKING: Speaker of Kaduna Assembly Removed by Appeal Court.

Busy Bee
Busy Bee November 27, 2023
Updated 2023/11/27 at 9:30 PM

The Court of Appeal has rendered a verdict resulting in the removal of the Speaker of the Kaduna State House of Assembly from office. In a significant legal development, the appellate court’s decision has ousted the incumbent Speaker, thereby prompting a reshuffling of leadership within the legislative body.

This legal outcome follows a presumably protracted and contentious legal battle that likely involved intricate arguments, presentations of evidence, and a thorough examination of relevant legal precedents. The decision to unseat the Speaker suggests that the court found merit in the case against them, raising questions about the legality or appropriateness of their tenure.

The ramifications of this court ruling extend beyond the immediate removal of the Speaker, as it has the potential to reshape the political landscape within the state. The assembly, tasked with representing the interests of the people and passing crucial legislation, will now have to navigate a period of transition and adjustment as it seeks to fill the leadership vacuum left by the ousted Speaker.

Furthermore, the court’s decision may have broader implications for the political dynamics within Kaduna State, influencing relationships between political actors, parties, and constituencies. The fallout from such legal proceedings can trigger ripple effects that resonate throughout the state’s political structure, impacting not only the legislature but also potentially influencing public opinion and electoral considerations.

As the news of the court’s decision reverberates through the state, it is likely to spark debates and discussions regarding the implications of the ruling for the democratic process and the rule of law. Observers, political analysts, and the general public will likely scrutinize the case, examining the legal arguments presented and the precedent set by this decision.

In summary, the Appeal Court’s decision to remove the Speaker of the Kaduna State House of Assembly marks a significant development in the legal and political landscape of the state. The aftermath of this ruling will undoubtedly shape the trajectory of the state’s politics, as the assembly grapples with leadership changes and the broader political community assesses the implications of this legal outcome.


The Court of Appeal, convening in Abuja, has rendered a decisive verdict nullifying the election victory of Hon. Yusuf Liman, the Speaker of the Kaduna State House of Assembly. Consequently, the court has mandated a rerun in a specific subset of the electoral landscape, focusing on five polling units within the Makera State constituency.

This development harks back to the prior decision of the Kaduna State Assembly Election Petitions Tribunal on September 30, 2023. At that juncture, the tribunal had invalidated the triumph of Hon. Yusuf Liman, the representative of Makera State constituency, decreeing a rerun in a more extensive array of 42 polling units.

The genesis of this legal tumult lies in a petition submitted to the Tribunal by Solomon Katuka, the candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). Katuka’s contention rested on the assertion that the election of Hon. Liman, a member of the All Progressives Congress (APC), was marred by severe irregularities. In the narrative woven by the PDP candidate, the electoral process had been compromised to such an extent that he, not Liman, emerged as the rightful victor in the House of Assembly Election held on March 18, 2023, in the Makera constituency. Consequently, Katuka maintained that he should have been declared the rightful winner.

The geographical scope of the mandated rerun is delineated by five specific polling units. These encompass 37 polling units within the Makera ward, two polling units in Barnawa ward, one polling unit in Kakuri Gwari ward, one polling unit in Television ward, and one polling unit in Kakuri Hausa ward. Collectively, these units sum up to the initially identified 42 polling units where electoral discrepancies are alleged to have occurred.


Expressing dissatisfaction with the Tribunal’s judgment, the candidate from the All Progressives Congress (APC) and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) jointly filed an appeal to challenge the Tribunal’s decision.

In a significant development, the Appeal Court, presided over by Justice O. O Adejumo, Justice A. O Oyetula, and Justice P. A Obiora, delivered a verdict on Friday, November 24, 2023, in Abuja. The outcome of this appeal resulted in the dismissal of the case brought forth by the APC candidate and INEC. However, the Appeal Court went a step further by altering the scope of the rerun election, reducing the number of affected polling units from the initial 42 mandated by the Tribunal to just five.

The specific polling units identified for the rerun, as stipulated by the appellate court, include Barnawa Ward PU 005 and 009, Kakuri Gwari PU 006, Television Ward PU 022, and Kakuri Hausa Ward PU 045.

As the electoral landscape currently stands, the APC has amassed 17,470 votes, while the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) secured 17,088 votes. Notably, the court nullified the election of the Speaker, citing a lead margin of 382 votes. This margin was deemed insufficient, falling below the total number of Permanent Voter Cards collected in the aforementioned affected polling units. Consequently, the court’s decision has set the stage for a rerun election in the designated units, shaping the political trajectory of the region.

Recent News

Share this Article
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *